Introduction to the discussion on Pnimiyus and Chitzoniyus Haratzon, the differences and how this explains that Mitzvos are from Pnimiyus HaRatzon. The differences are [Pnimiyus HaRatzon….]: 1) It serves only itself and is not secondary to anything, 2) can never be brought into reason (credibly), 3) It can never become weaker, 4) The idea of Ta’am Kamus doesn’t apply in Pnimiyus HaRatzon, 5) It can never be changed. Page 620-22, NEW SV p. 686-8.
